🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. This production, however, could coincide so closely with the mythologized version circulated by Russian state media that, within Russia, it reads as a compliment rather than a challenge.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Kremlin and the country's entertainment industry have worked together to forge a tailor-made version of Putin. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, a former spy reimagined as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a television show released last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “save” Russia from chaos. While the character's name Mikhail, the implication is clear: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals often end up reinforcing this same narrative instead of undercutting it. An adaptation inspired by a bestselling satirical novel sets out to subvert the Putin cult by framing him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the narrative weight to the spin doctors around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, the president is presented as having been chosen by influential figures to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, seeking permanent power.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. Historically, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The presidency was effectively a selection process with many contenders. Central to this process stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the state de facto.

• The shortlist featured several politicians, among them a reformer subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• Per a journalist who researched his rise, the chosen candidate merely met the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the events said the primary requirement was controllability and loyalty, not strength.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Claims about his clandestine activities in Dresden fall apart under examination. In essence, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with actual agent work.

Interestingly, the shift to depicting him as a “spy” could partly have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as 007. The grittier version led local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with Putin. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s appeared on city centers, feeding the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an star well-liked by Russian audiences, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's exclusion of public dissent, the political rivals, or prominent activists from its narrative, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

Domestically, Putin is often an all-powerful presence who remains unseen on screen. His influence is signaled through photographs or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently echo the very myths it perhaps aims to examine.