🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.